Back to Squawk list
  • 19

White House: 'Why we need aviation user fees'

送信時刻:
 
After almost 9,000 people urged the president to take damaging aviation user fees off the table, the administration on Jan. 13 offered its response: No way. (www.aopa.org) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


TXCAVU
How about ATC gets a system that actually works and then we'll talk fees.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
I am of the opinion the gov does not need another fee or tax for any purpose what so ever! Work with what you got, period.
jonprovencher
Woah! An idea that makes little sense, is vague, and is open to interpretation! When did the government start making those!?! *sarcasm intended*
andrewderr
andrewderr 0
It just makes me ill to read such a poorly written WH response. That lame response really does show us the intelligence factor (or lack thereof) at work in these fees. It took me 90 seconds of research to see the difference in the fuel taxes confirmed in the AOPA article. You would think the WH has these resources too. What a halfassed halfcocked halfthought response to 8904 citizens' petition.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
Lame has become the new standard.
kylevk
The response says that this fee would reduce the budget deficit by $10 billion over 10 years. The debt increases by FOUR BILLION DOLLARS every DAY.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
The plane is crashing but they have yet to declare an emergency.
chris13
This fits right in with their class-warfare rhetoric. Obviously, every person that flies an airplane MUST be one of those "evil" rich guys. If someone in the WH actually had a clue, they'd understand why user-fees will be crippling to the GA community.
CTaylor959
Added cost for student pilots is not a good thing for pilot population

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる