Back to Squawk list
  • 61

F-35 Cat-Shot

送信時刻:
 
Not exactly the USS Reagan, but still a CatShot. (defense.aol.com) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


BatonOps
That's pretty damn cool!
N9PS
Greg Busby 0
I can't wait to see that thing at Airventure one day
kholtz2
kholtz2 0
i remember hearing a loud noise that day but didnt see anything. i live about 5 miles away from the joint base
Stonesurfer
It must be weird being trained as a carrier crew..and go to Lakehurst instead. Still pretty cool, I've been to Lakehurst a few times before.
jcklke
Jack Lake 0
I spent a couple of tours at NAS Lakehurst. Did my jumping there.
SJRipp
I am in awe at the control surfaces on this aircraft! Terrific total system!
tpatracker
If the aircraft can fly vertically why is a cat-shot necessary? It seems like unnecessary strain.
bishops90
@ John, I've wondered this myself, but I presume it's because the Navy's carrier based version is not the VTOL variant for whatever reason. They gotta ge 'em off the carriers.
amacd
You can get airborne with a much bigger load if you shoot it off with the catapult. Then when you come back empty and void of weapons, you can make a vertical landing to refuel and rearm. The Harrier makes a rolling takeoff with a load and a vertical landing on return to the field, which may just be a short piece of Marsten Matting rolled off the back of a vehicle.

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる