← Back to Squawk list

US Court Orders Southwest to Give Fired Pro-Life Flight Attendant Her Job Back

送信時刻：丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前

Should Airlines and unions be able to discriminate against employees because of their religious beliefs? I don’t care what side of the abortion debate anyone follows but I do believe people should have the right to their opinions when not on the job. Also unions should be banned from using member’s dues for political purposes that are not related to their industry. So let’s hear everyone’s opinions on free speech and unions wasting members money on issues that have nothing to do with their… (www1.cbn.com) さらに...

Tim Dyck

13 人のメンバーからのコメント

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

paul wilson 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 6

It does seem safer at 30,000 ft to be with people that are pro-life, just saying

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Alan Glover 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Alan Glover 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Sorry.

Laughing emoji. :)

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sreekumar kumaran 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Southwest and the unions have no place in advocating free speech, union officials get away with all kinds of wrongs from not performing their jobs while living on members dues.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

waring 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

As far as I can tell from the article, the anti-abortion employee was complaining on Facebook that her union membership had chosen to participate in the Women's March, and didn't want to pay union dues. I suspect the union's issue with her had less to do with her religious beliefs, and more to do with her public (and possibly strident?) unwillingness to be part of the union (while still benefitting, of course, from their negotiations work.)

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Alan Glover 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Whatever happened to freedom of association?

I trust employers more than unions.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

patrick baker 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

i don't want to hear from this or any other airline employee if i am on their flight. No tee shirts, no comments, no discussions, because i bought passage not an infomercial

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

jetserf 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 4

According to the article, the company fired her for a social media post not anything she did at work.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Tim Dyck 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

She was let go for her posts on social media and there is no mention of her saying or doing anything wrong at work. So the issue is with what a company can do about what a person does in their off hours.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

jetserf 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

According to the article the company fired her for a social media post not anything she did at work.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

perlova 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

The article is from CBN, they may be a bit biased in their reporting.
Probably more to this story.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

George Lane 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

This does seem to be more about her philosophical disagreement with the union, rather than any form of expression she may have engaged in on the job.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

perlova 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

This linked article is from the Christian Broadcasting Network. It may not be the whole unvarnished truth about this situation. In any case, Southwest lost and will appeal or will pay up. Doesn’t mean that employees can now post what they want on social media without fear of any consequences.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

US Court Orders Southwest to Give Fired Pro-Life Flight Attendant Her Job Back

13 人のメンバーからのコメント

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

ログイン