← Back to Squawk list
  • 12

Why Pilots love flying the 747

送信時刻：
 
The design, power, and cockpit foot heaters that make the 747 feel like home to pilots. (www.slate.com) さらに...

Joseph Velardo
ニュースジャンキープロモーター利他主義者アナウンサー自叙伝作家

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


preacher1
preacher1 3
Never flew the 747. A very well written article. One thing though is that you can maintain a type rating if you stay current on it which many will not do for various reasons. For some it will depend on the job. I flew a 707 and then that went away, giving place to
a 757, which I flew for 29 years. As it went away, I went to a 767, but they carried a dual type rating. But, besides that I stayed current on a King Air and got current on a CRJ 200 as well, and a couple others for awhile. I personally feel about the 757 as this author did about the 747. A high stepping lady.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

[This poster has been suspended.]

preacher1
preacher1 1
I have been inside one, just never have flown one. 757 was not real roomy either
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
preacher1
preacher1 1
After I retired and then went back up awhile, I transitioned into the 767. The additional room on the deck is the first thing you notice. Then as you fly it, you find that while it's a good aircraft, it is not as responsive as the 757; of course it's bigger
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
30west
30west 1
-200 or -300ER? I was not a fan of the -200's flying characteristics. I thought the ER was much better, but still not as nicely balanced or responsive as the pilots' airplane....the 757.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
rkurian
Ravee Kurian 1
Am not a pilot but have loved the B757 forever. Beautiful lines on that jet. It always felt over-powered. Seemed like the takeoff roll was always shorter and the initial climb was always quicker. Have heard though that its low speed characteristics in bank were tricky but I wouldn't know.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
preacher1
preacher1 3
It flew pretty hot. It was a racehorse but you had to fly it. It was responsive and you actually flew a ways ahead of yourself because of that responsiveness.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
LoralThomas
Loral Thomas 1
Preacher - RB211's?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
preacher1
preacher1 1
Yeah, we came off of a 707. My MX guy was an RR guy.LOL. That was one reason we had to wait on getting it. RR was among the last getting EYOPS cert.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
LoralThomas
Loral Thomas 1
Those RB211's were one of the reasons I liked the L-1011 so much. Never been on the 757. Just don't fly much anymore.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
THRUSTT
THRUSTT 1
That EYOPS must've hurt...
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
preacher1
preacher1 1
Smart aleck
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
dee9bee
dee9bee 1
The 757 was my favorite as well. Very well balanced and a pleasure to hand-fly. Getting to fly the 767 was a 'seniority thing' and when I got the opportunity, I would tend to overcontrol (especially in bank) until I got used to it. By then, I was right back on the 757...Sorry to get off the main subject :-)
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
dtw757
mike SUT 2
757 is my favorite...flew the 747s both -200 and -400 version..great plane, flew the DC-10, my generations DC-3 the 727, A320 and A330...couldn't wait to get off them, like flying a computer game complete with control stick. 767 was fun but didn't feel as sporty as the 757. The 757 and the P-3 were equals in maneuverability, lots of power, and just a great solid feeling underneath you. There REALLY is something about a Boeing that makes you feel your are in a pilots plane.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
oowmmr
oowmmr 1
http://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boeings-747-boosted-by-jumbo-order-from-russian-cargo-airline/
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
rkurian
Ravee Kurian 1
Another beautifully written and evocative excerpt from 'Skyfaring' the book by Speedbird FO, Mark Vanhoenacker... - the book is out now incidentally.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
andrew357
andrew357 1
i love this legendary classic aircraft and have flown on many series 100-200-300-400 completely safe but sad they are dissapearing from our skies the real Queen of the skies.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
oowmmr
oowmmr 1
When the 747 was new, it was town news that it would be at KSJC. It had a short fuselage was really stout and stocky quite a site. When passing by KSFO, its still satisfying to see one of those, larger and grown up, magnificent birds.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
iflyfsx
iflyfsx 1
It's such a shame that fuel prices and the efficiency of the 777 practically killed the 747. But we do have a few 747-8i for a few more years.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
preacher1
preacher1 1
Yeah, they'll be around for awhile but will eventually go the way of the 380. They can't carry the # of pax but they are a lot more flexible as far as destinations go. They will live a long life as a freighter after the pax are gone.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
iflyfsx
iflyfsx 1
And it will be the next presidential airplane.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
rad2
Roger Deeringer 1
As a passenger, the 747 is my choice. Flying in heavy weather on those big birds is a feeling of comfort. NRT to SIN in December is always an adventure with the high headwinds. On one flight in 2012 had a ground speed of less than 300 kph at 41000. The head wind was being displayed at 150+ kph. The 747 was rock solid. Did the same flight on a 772er in 2014 and was bounced around to the point the flight attendants buckled up with the shoulder straps.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

ログイン

パスワードをお忘れですか？
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか？ 今すぐ登録（無料）！機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます！
FlightAwareに登録する
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる