Back to Squawk list
  • 13

U.S. Airlines And Travel Agencies Drop Face Mask Policy

送信時刻:
 
The bulk of U.S. airlines have dropped mask mandates in response to yesterday's court ruling striking down the April 13th extension of the transport mask policy. (www.gatechecked.com) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


avionik99
So I can imagine that some airports will still demand we wear them indoors? And remove them upon entering the aircraft? Anyone see this happening?
KicksOnRoute66
Many are following the TSA guidelines and are dropping them as well.
ghstark
Greg S 3
O'Hare yesterday. Sign on the entrance doors saying "City of Chicago requires masks in the airport" but American didn't require them on the plane and the flight attendants were not wearing them.
mwtshv1959
Yes I foresee this happening at airports whose local jurisdictions have an indoor mandate. Judge Mizelle's decision only vacates the illegal action of a federal executive agency.
mwtshv1959
Thank you Judge Mizelle for a well-reasoned decision that on Patriot's Day reminded us that we are a Republic whose laws flow from the Constitution and not ruled by the whims of government agencies or men.
clarify
clarify 1
I'm guessing you're not a lawyer. I'm not. But a couple of errors in your comment. First, mask mandates are not a whim, the evidence that they're effective at limiting spread of an airborne virus such as COVID is substantial (a frequent poster here's frequent citing of the so-called "Danish study" notwithstanding). I've perused Mizelle's ruling and she relies on the narrowest possible interpretation of the word "sanitize" and its various forms to achiever her apparent goal of striking down the mask mandates involving travel. Second, the Constitution does not prohibit Congress from empowering federal administrative agencies to manage large swaths of administrative law. Congress, after all, is not expert in public health, the control of disease, the intricacies of aviation, and so forth, so they've created agencies to manage the details of all these.
mwtshv1959
The effectiveness of masks is not the central question of this case. The central question is did CDC act in a legal manner in issuing the mandate. Judge Mizell considered at length the meaning and context of the term "sanitize" at the time the law was written and as it appears within the law. Judge Mizell at length discussed and annotated within her decision the reasons CDC acted illegally; thus making the mandate not enforceable. Congress can not empower any agency to violate the Constitution or laws flowing from the Constitution. The judicial branch has the responsibility to review and strike down illegal agency actions thus protecting the rights of all citizens of the Republic.

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる