|
SUD-EST SE-210 Caravelle —
Another of my faded old Kodak 620 film photographs that I had tossed into the trash but then "rescued" (lol) from the garbage can just as the trash truck was approaching. Not only was this mid-1960s snap of a UAL Sud Aviation Caravelle VI badly faded, but it was also taken rather far away with my old Kodak Bullseye camera so in the actual photo this Caravelle is really just a small part of the overall scene. I cropped the shot down (which is why this gallery post is sized so small), and then I did my best to resurrect the color. I considered turning it into just a B&W pic, but after examining both options I think that even tho it isn't great the color is OK so I posted this one.
The photo was taken at Newark Metropolitan Airport (known today as Newark Liberty International - KEWR).
Comments
I believe the Aircraft Type code for the Caravelle is S210.
A list of ICAO Aircraft Type codes can be found in: http://cfapp.icao.int/Doc8643/reports/Part2-By%20Type%20Designator%28Decode%29.pdf
Note that some of the codes – such as CONI – are associated with multiple variants of the same aircraft. Also, different manufacturers if the same (basic) aircraft such as the North American F86 Sabre also built by Canadair, Commonwealth (Australia), and Mitsubishi are listed under the same code. The list of aircraft is not comprehensive – for example the North American Fury is not listed but should probably be included with the F86 group.
If you are unhappy with the aircraft name/description displayed, refer to:
Why does FlightAware show an overly specific or incorrect aircraft description for a particular aircraft type?
This is one of the questions under the “Tracking Data” heading in http://flightaware.com/about/faq .
The following quote, from: http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Aircraft_Type_Designator hopefully, explains the Aircraft Type code:
“In principle, ICAO allocates an Aircraft Type Designator to all aircraft heavier than ultra/micro light. A designator consists of not more than four characters and is primarily intended for use in flight plans and associated air traffic services messages. Each designator is, in principle, to be derived from the manufacturer’s model number or model name or, from a common military type number. Only one designator is assigned per aircraft type - a different designator for a variant or subtype will only be allocated when a difference in a performance is significant for air traffic services, or when no shared designator can be assigned”.
Peter >> A big TYVM for the link to the Aircraft Type Codes info. I'd read (and heard) occasional references to this listing but I never suspected it was so detailed ... and (my VERY bad here) I never researched to find it. I am extremely appreciative. I've made the correction above (changed it to S210) and I'll be making a few more corrections to some of my other oldies shots in my FA folder. Once more, Thank You very much, Peter. (Wave)
Cliff ... TY for the info about the origin of the Caravelle's nose design. I had not known that.
Zennermd ... TY for pointing out that Connie off in the background. The original photo I have here was so yellowed with age that there was no way to view any "detail" of that Connie, but now that I was able to normalize the photo's original colors somewhat, that Connie is a bit more distinctive ... and although it is still very difficult to be certain, those horizontal marks on the triple tails along with the markings on the side remind me of MATS (Military Air Transport Service) markings. I believe that is an old MATS aircraft. Thank you for mentioning that the Connie was visible back there. I'd forgotten it was there.
Smokey ... I was only at EWR twice, both times as a young teen who told my folks I was going to spend the day watching planes at Buffalo Airport but would hop on a flight, spend the day flying around to other cities, and then go home that evening with no one at home being aware I'd been in other cities taking pictures. Back then it was easy for a kid to buy a ticket and hop on an airliner and go off on a flight. I got away with it for years (lol). This photo was either taken one day in 1965 when I flew from KBUF to KEWR and back home or on a day in 1967 when I went from KBUF to KEWR to KJFK and then back home. (I was 15 and 17). I'm sorry I can't be more exact about when I took it.
Will, TY for commenting. :-)
Howdy, James. Sorry I missed seeing your comment earlier; just now saw it. TYVM for the comment.
BTW, this may have been one of the "males only" flights that UA flew between EWR and ORD. The flight was operated with a Caravelle. Can you imagine that today? Wow.
http://viewfromthewing.boardingarea.com/2015/05/27/united-airlines-men-only-executive-service/
I remember great food on the VARIG planes, too.
Joseph ... when you get a free minute, click on the link (below) that will take you to a podcast / blogsite article I posted last year. (When you get there, if you click on the individual pics in the article, the full-size shots will open. Fine quality.)
Rob ... TY for commenting and also for confirming my window question. I just finished viewing other shots of Caravelles in FA's gallery and your description of them as "tear drop" is spot on. http://www.planeviz.com/propeller-echoes-mohawk-airlines/
The jet is a DC-8 behind the Caravelle - no question. All that ground equipment is awesome in the photo.
Mark ... (sorry it took so long to reply. didn't see your question 'til now.) I'd never heard of curtains, but perhaps some of these folks who have flown on them may recall. (It'd be cool to find a pic of one that shows curtains in the windows.)
nycsic1, CarlJodie, Dougs Z & C, and Anson ... Howdy and TY for the comments. (Wave)
Look what I found and a nice description by Gary Schenauer of the United Airlines Caravelle submitted 3 years ago by him. Not really clear but some gems are not.
Please log in or register to post a comment.