Sweet!

(Written on 2019年05月08日)(Permalink)

Squatting at Haneda? Don't be ridiculous. That never happened.

(Written on 2019年05月04日)(Permalink)

This is getting old.

(Written on 2019年05月03日)(Permalink)

Southwest would be foolish not to look at alternatives no matter the situation. Neither Southwest nor Boeing should be slaves to each other.

(Written on 2019年04月24日)(Permalink)

Looks bland to me.

(Written on 2019年04月24日)(Permalink)

Actually, accidents were not why any of those planes were "re-branded". Accidents had nothing to do with it. Study your history. The MD-10 is a DC-10 with a glass cockpit, and only with FedEx freighters. The MD-11 was a derivation of the DC-10 after McDonnel merged with Douglas Aircraft. The 717 was indeed a re-branding of the MD-95 to make it more "Boeing". There has been no MD-95/B717 accident.

(Written on 2019年04月17日)(Permalink)

I may be all wet here, but I see a similarity between the A380 and the B777X. Both aircraft are centered primarily around one customer - Emirates. Both have lackluster sales. I hope I'm wrong about the B777X, but I am suspicious any time an aircraft is built for essentially one customer. Don't forget the L-1011's story.

(Written on 2019年02月16日)(Permalink)

File this under "How to rile a Southwestphile"!

(Written on 2019年01月17日)(Permalink)

Poppycock

(Written on 2019年01月13日)(Permalink)

Twaddle.

(Written on 2019年01月13日)(Permalink)