← Back to Squawk list
  • 14

Philippine Airlines 777 Makes Emergency Landing After Engine Flames

送信時刻：
 
A Philippine Airlines service operating from Los Angeles International to Manila Airport made an emergency landing yesterday (21st November) due to an engine fire. The incident happened shortly after takeoff. Philippine Airlines Flight PR113 had only just left Los Angeles International Airport when shortly after it returned back to the ground following an engine fire. The service, bound for the Philippines, left the airport at 11:45 local time but returned just 15 minutes later. (simpleflying.com) さらに...

Kobe Hunte
パパラッチウィークリーピックニュースジャンキー限度件数登録者愛好家信頼できる友人優等生デイリーピックアマチュアの写真家プロモーターアナウンサー自叙伝作家

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


ravanviman
hal pushpak 2
Looks an awful lot like a compressor stall (surge), not an "engine fire," per se.
YouTube "compressor stall".
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
tjd1969
Tim Duggan 3
Not only the engine fire (did they shut the engine down?) and that damage to be investigated and repaired, but I would surmise an over-weight landing too, since they apparently didn't dump fuel. Of course, a fire would mean get on the ground quickly... Over-weight landings be damned.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
sgbelverta
sharon bias 1
Per another LA TV station, the plane did not dump fuel, so tires were all flattened. Also, pilot issued a Mayday, Mayday call. Would love to listen to that recording.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
tjd1969
Tim Duggan 1
ATC.net Likely has that recording. Los Angeles Approach frequency usually 124.9 (At least when I was flying!)....
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
williambaker08
william baker 0
The atc recording is running around on youtube already
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
Coalora
Coalora 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0IZTmp5lyg

VAS had this up even before the sensationalist news reported on this "Engine Explosion in Flight!!!1". Pretty clear compressor stall, but they were prudent to return.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 1
Better for it to happen there instead of half-way across the Pacific in a twin that just became a single.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
tjd1969
Tim Duggan 1
That's why we use ETOPS procedures. But yes, a fire if uncontrolled and two or more hours until a safe diversion landing? Scary....
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
RECOR10
RECOR10 -3
Nope, no justification for quad engine....none.................well, until there is.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
tjd1969
Tim Duggan 4
AS I said previously. ETOPS procedures are designed specifically for twin-engine over-water operations. Consensus: ETOPS is for an engine failure on a twin-jet over-water. A fire? Well, if uncontrolled is mighty scary.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

ログイン

パスワードをお忘れですか？
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか？ 今すぐ登録（無料）！機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます！
FlightAwareに登録する
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる