← Back to Squawk list
  • 41

Southwest 1380 plane in the air again

送信時刻：
 
Southwest’s Boeing 737-700 that operated Flight 1380 that was fatal for one passenger earlier in April just left the city where it landed and flew to Paine Field (PAE) in Everett, Washington, on Monday. The flight path on Flight Aware shows the aircraft registered N772SW taking off Monday morning from Philadelphia (PHL), where it was forced to make an emergency landing after one of its engines exploded and sent shrapnel crashing through a window, killing Jennifer Riordan, 43. Flight here:… (thepointsguy.com) さらに...

Chris B
トレンドセッターニュースジャンキー信頼できる友人発言者アマチュアの写真家プロモーターアナウンサー

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


joshuagriffin
Josh Griffin 1
Wouldn't want to be on that flight
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
smithfc
Francis smith 1
Must have plugged the hole in the fuselage. Track shows the flight was at 40000 ft.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
Highflyer1950
Highflyer1950 1
More likely that Boeing will do some sheet metal work and probably replace the leading edge devices on the left wing, just a guess however.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
TDovel
Tom Dovel 0
Never mind. I see that they replaced the left engine while in Philly.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
TDovel
Tom Dovel 1
So they flew it 5000 miles on one engine?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
bandito
bandito -3
Man this guy is stupid.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
sparkie624
sparkie624 2
I don't think so.... You cannot ferry on just one engine.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
sparkie624
sparkie624 -3
Looks it was a ferry flight... Article title is misleading!
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
rdlink
rdlink 4
Plane was in Philadelphia. It flew to Seattle. Means it was in the air again. Pretty straightforward to me. If the article would have said in service again that would have been misleading.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
sparkie624
sparkie624 -6
To me, In the air by the way the article implies would mean Revenue Service.... I would not classify any Ferry Flight as "Back IN The Air!"
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
lartac
Leon Artac 8
Get off your high horse. "To me" just means as you see it. You're not ALWAYS right you know.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
royr2
royr2 -1
Sparkie is right. The headline would be misleading to anyone not familiar with aviation or ferry flights. It kind of implies that the plane is just flying around again with missing pieces and stuff, back in service. Reading the article would prove otherwise, but then we all know lots of people don't read anything but headlines...and comments.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
royr2
royr2 1
And there's also not a lot of info in this particular article either to further mislead folks. The engine was indeed replaced in PHL and now the plane is going to Boeing for further repairs and probably investigation. But this article says none of that - have to find that infor elsewhere. Poorly written, IMO.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
lartac
Leon Artac 3
Your both wrong. Just read all the info and then form an opinion.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
hintonll
Larry Hinton 1
The plane is at the ATS Facility on Paine field being repaired.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/everett/southwest-jet-in-fatal-explosion-to-be-repaired-in-everett/281-547408288
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
Zaphod58
Steven Fortson 1
They're doing the engine inspections there. A couple of days after the accident 10 Southwest aircraft ferried there.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
Lneward
Lance Neward 1
Thanks for the clarification.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
Lneward
Lance Neward 2
Does anyone know why the containment ring didn't do what it is ostensibly designed to do, i.e. contain a broken blade, either fan or turbine?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
cfhfp
miles janzen 5
According to the NTSB youtube report I watched, the containment ring did contain the broken blade, as you can see in any pictures, the whole fan section is visible, it was the bad vibration set up by the imbalance that broke the intake section of the nacelle off and sent pieces flying
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
don26
Don Gillies 1
Does anyone know if the lady pulled through the window was wearing a seat belt?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
PhoenixAF24
Brian Hankey 3
Yes, she was.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
CT7567
CT7567 1
Retiring that plane would be a huge loss for SWA
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
PhoenixAF24
Brian Hankey 4
I don't think so - it was one of the older 737-700s It was already 18 yrs old and according to https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/Boeing/737/N772SW-Southwest-Airlines/9nqwiajb it shows as being stored in Renton.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
sparkie624
sparkie624 4
18 years old is not necessarily that old for a 737, it is still early for that.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
yr2012
matt jensen 1
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/ntsb-confirms-what-shattered-the-window-on-deadly-southwest-flight/ar-AAwJDfw?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

ログイン

パスワードをお忘れですか？
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか？ 今すぐ登録（無料）！機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます！
FlightAwareに登録する
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる