すべて
4 投票数
(4.00 平均)
と
2,397 閲覧数
 |
|
Comments
Maybe a C175 Cardinal-RG?
This a 1980 Cessna 172RG Cutlass, I don't believe the 175 ever came in an RG version and the Cardinal didn't have any wing struts.
Hey, I just enter the tail numbers in the FAA "N" number inquiry and then enter into Flightaware whatever model number the FAA says it is. I will admit, the FAA said this is an 172RG, but I never bother with sub classifications because, frankly, I don't care. All Mooney's are M20s as far as I am concerned.:)
Jim is correct. This is a 172RG, which was marketed by Cessna as a Cutlass and not a Skyhawk.
The Cutlass was actually certified using the Cessna 175 type certificate.
He's correct also regarding the Cessna 175 being exclusively a non-retractable gear aircraft.
The Cutlass was actually certified using the Cessna 175 type certificate.
He's correct also regarding the Cessna 175 being exclusively a non-retractable gear aircraft.
The main difference between the 172 and 175 was the engine...172 has a direct drive engine while the 175 had a reduction gearbox...had a hump on the cowling for the gearbox
The 175 is the skylark...the 172 is the Skyhawk and the 172rg is the cutlass
Jim and Cliff are correct...the 175 had struts like the 172/182
The 177 cardinal didn't have wing struts
The 175 is the skylark...the 172 is the Skyhawk and the 172rg is the cutlass
Jim and Cliff are correct...the 175 had struts like the 172/182
The 177 cardinal didn't have wing struts
|
運航表
1998年のN6426Vに関する全資料を検索しますか？ 今すぐ購入。1時間以内に入手できます。
|
| 日付 | 機種 | 出発地 | 目的地 | 出発 | 到着 | 時間 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024年04月17日 | C72R | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | 17時02分 PDT | 17時07分 PDT | 0:04 |
| 2024年04月17日 | C72R | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | 16時35分 PDT | 16時59分 PDT | 0:23 |
| 2024年04月15日 | C72R | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | Brackett Fld (KPOC) | 14時46分 PDT | 14時58分 PDT | 0:12 |
| ベーシックユーザー（登録は無料で簡単です！）は3 monthsの履歴を見ることができます。 登録する | ||||||
Please log in or register to post a comment.