(登録 または ログイン)
  264 投票数 (4.80 平均) と 280,672 閲覧数  

Boeing MD-11 (N285UP)
/images/icons/csMagGlass.png / / フル

Boeing MD-11 (N285UP)



Please log in or register to post a comment.

not a very good landing there
too tough
Actually, this landing is not a bad one. While it may be flared a bit too much, it is almost in the middle of the touchdown zone.
Landing seems ok but Lots of burnt rubber indicates- high approach speed I guess
Where did this occur?
Jean Calmes
it looks like the landing gears are wrongly positioned at 90 degrees off the path ! How is this possible for an expert in synchronization?
darren clare
No spoiler landing, presumably is why it was a little heavy?
Locked breaks IMO
Dick Ware
Its 'ops'! flight not UPS!!!
I see 8 responses and most are incorrect. It is not a very good landing. It is short and prior to the touchdown zone. The brakes are not locked up. The approach speed was probably low hence the high attitude and early touchdown. Spoilers will be coming up very shortly. No idea about what "90 degrees off path" means.
I support eprn1n2
My favorite landing shot I've seen!
Although this pic is nice, I agree with Eprn1n2 about the landing specifications...
That's not a landing. That's a burnout on takeoff.
James Dubick
UPS and Fedex have a history of landing incidents with MD-11 aircraft. A company in White Plains (I can't recall the name but something like flight systems inc.) has been contracted to develop an improved angle of attack system for this aircraft. My brother flew them for Delta back in the 90s and remarked to me that it was not a fun airplane to land.
Alden Sewell
Delta never had any Md- 11s , we had about 5 DC-10s leased while awiating delayed delivery of our L-1011s Acrft.Insp. ( Ret,)
It's a great photo & you got your package, move on....
James Dubick
Yes Delta had MD-11s. They were based out of Portland and did the North Pacific routes.
A moment well captured!
I agree with Jean Calmes - the wheels on the right (starboard) main undercarriage appear to be aligned at 90 degrees to the direction of travel - maybe the port side is or is not. Such an unfortunate set-up would certainly produce a lot of smoke! Actually, the starboard smoke appears to be emanating from the rear wheel of the three-wheel set. This wheel would touch ground first and if 90 degrees out of alignment would generate lots of smoke.
If management sees a photograph of a poor landing, would the pilot be reprimanded? Or would management already know because of the flight data and documentation?
I think must have something to do with the reason almost all of my UPS deliveries arrive damaged!
If the landing gear are oriented 90 degrees from the direction of travel, that would mean that the plane was flying completely sideways and the landing gear would collapse under the intense lateral stresses. It may be possible that the crew had to crab the landing, which would likely produce more tire smoke, but 90 degrees is absolutely impossible.
Nice Trap, GO NAVY. Talk about using all the tarmac! Must be a short runway. Thankfully there's no wind. Used to love watching the freighters leaving DEN early in the mornings when I was prestarting the ground equipment and enjoying a coffee and a smoke! I liked the FEDEX pilots the best,, it was like my very own airshow every morning! I would park my tug at the end of the horse shoe at the end of terminal B and just enjoy ! :)
Hence the meaning of a " Controlled Crash"?
Jens NannenPhoto Uploader
This is a hard but A-OK landing. Runways is not short, it's about 10000ft long (4km almost) - and was a certified runway for the spaceshuttle. My shot looks spectacular but nothing dangerous.
Robert Bell
New robber all around please!
john fusco
first of all too early,fast,overloaded.fed ex and ups overload these planes,he or she did the best she could.very hard to land these planes as well
Davon Grant
Lol it looks like if it made a sharp 90 degree angle n pop a wheelie. BOss
ANY landing you can walk away from, is a good one!
Keith Taylor
Must have a teenager driving her.
Being a pilot, I agree with Jesse, Any Landing You Can Walk Away From Is A Good Landing.
Love some of the other comments, like CB Hardy's. He's a thinker.
......and you thought you were hard on your brakes.
Jon Arvik
The wheels are fine; look at the full-screen image and expand it as wide as you can. It's an optical illusion that at first glance does indeed look like the wheel trucks are off by 90 degrees.
Tommy Ding
It seems a very heavy landing... Maybe the gears can be damaged...
Buenisima captura
Drag racing DC-10 What a concept...Top Fuel Funny Plane : )
Firm plant! Nailed it. Grnd Ops will be scraping rubber off 14L-32R for days.
expensive smoke.
So this is way packages arrive late!
john fusco
thanks,for all ,this was one lomg flight,but we got it finished,wet pants and all...lol
Nothing wrong with the landing it landed didnt it?
Wow, so many of the comments are so critical. How about "Great photo"?
Tail strike - worst I've ever seen!
If you can walk away, good landing!
C.W. Reed
A good landing is one that you can walk away from, AND re-use the airplane again!
John Barrer
what do you mean landing, that's what you call a UPS short field takeoff!
John McCabe
"I see my order of 1,255 anvils just arrived!"
Ed Hill
Very nice photo of landing!
Jonah Crosby
Josh Edgar
this is why your stuff arrives broken
Mike MacDonald
Vulcansunray, I agree, port and starboard wheelsets seem to be disproportionately different in both size and shape!
However, the photographer says it was not an unusual landing???????
Diane: this is Cologne-Bonn (CGN)
Jim Costello
Sorry just couldn't hold that in much longer!
donald moore
Mike Gallagher
Took that last right turn a little tight....Just sayin.
smokeshow !
Bob Yurek
The comments by all the "professional pilots" on this photo are hilarious. 90 degree landing gear position? WTF?, spoilers not extended, "middle of the landing zone" and so on and so on. And it's not a "triple seven". Bitch needs to be planted.
Chris Croft
Another clear example of why FedEx is "Varsity" and UPS "JV"
Full disclosure, I work for FedEx
Darin Dexheimer
Rough landing
1998年のN285UPに関する全資料を検索しますか? 今すぐ購入。1時間以内に入手できます。
日付 機種 出発地 目的地 出発 到着 時間
2022年01月16日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 () 15時27分 EST 16時06分 CST 1:38
2022年01月14日 MD11ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 09時05分 CST 11時40分 EST 1:34
2022年01月14日 MD11シカゴ・ロックフォード国際空港 ()ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 () 03時14分 CST 04時50分 CST 1:35
2022年01月13日 MD11ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 ()シカゴ・ロックフォード国際空港 () 22時27分 CST 00時06分 CST (+1) 1:38
2022年01月13日 MD11Columbia Metro ()ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 () 10時21分 EST 11時24分 CST 2:02
2022年01月13日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()Columbia Metro () 04時51分 EST 05時43分 EST 0:51
2022年01月12日 MD11ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 20時35分 CST 23時13分 EST 1:37
2022年01月12日 MD11ニューアーク・リバティー国際空港 ()ダラス・フォートワース国際空港 () 08時14分 EST 10時22分 CST 3:07
2022年01月12日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()ニューアーク・リバティー国際空港 () 03時23分 EST 04時43分 EST 1:20
2022年01月11日 MD11ピッツバーグ国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 21時57分 EST 22時51分 EST 0:53
2022年01月11日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()ピッツバーグ国際空港 () 04時50分 EST 05時40分 EST 0:49
2022年01月11日 MD11トロント・ピアソン国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 00時23分 EST 01時31分 EST 1:08
2022年01月 7日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()トロント・ピアソン国際空港 () 07時07分 EST 08時12分 EST 1:04
2022年01月 6日 MD11カンザスシティ国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 21時45分 CST 23時50分 EST 1:05
2022年01月 6日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()カンザスシティ国際空港 () 05時16分 EST 05時31分 CST 1:14
2022年01月 5日 MD11マイアミ国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 09時17分 EST 11時22分 EST 2:04
2022年01月 5日 MD11ルイビル国際空港 ()マイアミ国際空港 () 04時48分 EST 06時37分 EST 1:49
2022年01月 4日 MD11シャーロット・ダグラス国際空港 ()ルイビル国際空港 () 21時52分 EST 22時52分 EST 0:59
ベーシックユーザー(登録は無料で簡単です!)は3 monthsの履歴を見ることができます。 登録する


アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!