すべて
|
Comments
Yet another instance of inaccurate "ratings" being given to a photo. This is a clean, crisp, HQ snap, taken in difficult full-overhead sun light conditions, of a wonderful GA bird, but after four votes have been given, I see the overall rating is 3.75. Seriously? 3.75? This is a full five shot. I admit to a small bit of bias: the Pilatus is my #1 fave propbird, but even if I weren't biased, a 3.75 average means someone, at least one and possibly more than one, had to have voted this shot either "3" or lower?
OK, end of rant. This one is a primo 5, Clement. A tip of the cap to you.
OK, end of rant. This one is a primo 5, Clement. A tip of the cap to you.
Thank You, Gary, Much appreciated !
I'll have to say the same as Gary. The reflection of the wing on the side of the aircraft blends nicely with the wavy paint scheme. My only question is why did you cut off part of the tail?
Chris; It was just due to the lens I had on the camera at the time, that i was at STS. Have developed an interest in the PC12 since I first heard of AMELIA ROSE EARHART (2014) making her around the world trip in one.
運航表
1998年のN576RGに関する全資料を検索しますか? 今すぐ購入。1時間以内に入手できます。
|
日付 | 機種 | 出発地 | 目的地 | 出発 | 到着 | 時間 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Recent History Data | ||||||
ベーシックユーザー(登録は無料で簡単です!)は3 monthsの履歴を見ることができます。 登録する |
Please log in or register to post a comment.