すべて
← Back to Squawk list
F-35 Engines from United Technologies called Unreliable
GAO report indicates deep flaws with powerplant and says has limited progress for program going forward (www.bloomberg.com) さらに...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Or this. If you change prowess to 'pipe dream' it reads better.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/flawed-f-35-why-pentagon-153300333.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/flawed-f-35-why-pentagon-153300333.html
With all the problems with this plane the govern still wants, the military does not want it, and it has so many problems... The A10 to be replaced if government has its way does much of the job of the F35
The UAF suits want it in order to keep them in a job and have one with Lockheed when they retire but ain't nobody outside the beltway wants it. Problem is, the way Lockheed has go production spread out, there are too many jobs in key congressional districts that it will be like a cat, having 9 lives and can't be killed. The sequester cut the suits down a notch, but they want A10 money to go to the F-35
Becoming increasingly difficult to tell whose side the current regime and all its minions is on! I am even more dismayed when a company like Lockheed has drunk the Koolade. The things I thought I understood?
Unfortunately, the folks responsible for this weapon system are still fighting the Cold War. What about the next war? Oh, that requires some thought. - Congress feathering the beds of their supporters. I wish this nation's leadership, both political and military, would attempt to look ahead and build something that works. One size does not fit all - ever!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-most-expensive-weapons-system-114431632.html
Nice picture of the Fup-35 and it's accoutrements. Which are currently operational, which fit into/on the craft while keeping it 'stealthy'? How does this compare with the operations loads of the F-15, F-16, F-18, A-10 or even the B-17?