I posted for readers like you to make your own judgement and comments. I've flown mostly pipers for 5 years safely and withiin published limits. That being said my goal in posting is creating conversation to debunk something that seems more sensational than actual in fact. It's a legal based article, but I found it based more on opinion than actual hard facts myself. Thank you for commenting and I'd glad it motivated you to post such an educated reply. It's people such as yourself that contribute factual experiences that can put this article in perspective. I'm of the opinion if this was true design flaw, the FAA or NTSB would've grounded such a critical flaw don't you think? Thank you again for your contribution to the post
I could use a cheap piper twin courtesy of US government. I'll pay to fix the mechanical issue. These guys have not watched cocaine cowboys obviously aye!
(Duplicate Squawk Submitted)
Saab SF 340 lands safely after prop falls off
Saab SF340 lost its prop and made a safe precautionary landing in Austrailia. Great single engine flying and pilot very calm
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-17/rex-flight-forced-into-emergency-landing-after-losing-propeller/8364218?pfmredir=sm