YES IT IS. This man could have put an aircraft into the ground and killed all aboard, as effectively as did the evil Muslim dreck on 9/11. Have we already forgotten? Are we THAT politically correct?

(Written on 2019年09月13日)(Permalink)

Please do not jump to "confusions." MD-11 was designed and named well after the DC-10's troubles. MD-10 was named such, as the two-person crew airplane made possible by advanced avionics. Both were initiated and developed by the postmerger McDonnell Douglas; hence the "MD." the DC-10 was initiated by predecessor Douglas Aircraft.

(Written on 2019年03月22日)(Permalink)

Thank you!!!

(Written on 2018年12月31日)(Permalink)

In the accompanying video at 0:33 there appears to be an MD-80 with its tail visible in the new American paint scheme, which was something we had believed, confirmed by the airline, that would not happen. Does anyone know the registration or tail number, or have an actual photo of this aircraft?

(Written on 2018年12月29日)(Permalink)

"...a ground vehicle came in contact with the plane..." That's like Amtrak Media Relations who, when there is an outright train wreck, says the train "lost contact with the rail."

(Written on 2018年05月11日)(Permalink)

What's next? NOW what will Oscar Munoz say? "This place is all screwed up...I quit?"? It certainly seems to be out of control.

(Written on 2017年07月07日)(Permalink)

NOT an excuse. Couldn't the gate agent see that there were TWO people? A two-year old toddler generally does not look like a lap infant.

(Written on 2017年07月07日)(Permalink)

Trump needs to tell the WTO and the EU to F*** OFF.

(Written on 2016年12月02日)(Permalink)

Did the Philadelphia lawyers fly to Chicago on American?

(Written on 2016年11月19日)(Permalink)

Exactly why retention of the A-10 is needed. You don't send a fighter to do the attack job, or vice versa.

(Written on 2016年10月29日)(Permalink)