← Back to Squawk list
  • 23

Alaska's Anchorage prepares for extra air traffic from airlines bypassing Russian airspace

送信時刻：
 
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA — After the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Anchorage airport is set to welcome airlines aiming to bypass Russian airspace (www.airlinerwatch.com) さらに...

Tom Novak
トレンドセッターニュースジャンキー信頼できる友人発言者アマチュアの写真家プロモーター利他主義者アナウンサー自叙伝作家

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


volvodadfast
Ichiro Sugioka 5
It is also interesting to note that Japanese airlines are not impacted. Example: JAL44
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
rayzeeman
Ray Zimmermann 1
JAL44 now goes westbound, adding about 4-5 hours to its flight time.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
jptq63
jptq63 3
Interesting / related to flight pattern in EU -- PBD263 on March 2, 2022 -- but wonder if similar flight patterns would evolve here and elsewhere. Also wonder if EU would start rejecting any flight entering EU airspace from Russian airspace regardless of origin of flight? I.e. thought here is to level the playing field or rather the flight routes of planes from countries not barred from Russian airspce...?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
sgbelverta
sharon bias 3
Hopefully the airport is ratcheting up services now. They need to make sure they have extra jet fuel available on very short notice. Maybe get building extra jet fuel storage tanks?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
hubertkraft
Hubert Kraft 0
Should be temporary only. Once when Putin has been removed and everything went to quiet normal, planes will go the direkt route
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
21voyageur
21voyageur 5
Your definition of "temporary" is???? Days, Weeks, Months, Years?????
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
strickerje
strickerje 1
I guess technically, just about everything is temporary then. ;) I also don't anticipate this being over particularly soon either, but hopefully I'm wrong on that.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
iaincmaciver
Iain Maciver 2
I would not count on that.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
SeanAwning
Sean Awning 1
Where are they going to park? Polar 2 and 6? UPS 14 and 15? Is there a hydrant at TWY Juliet?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
cpergiel
Chuck Pergiel 2
Why is parking a problem?
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
SeanAwning
Sean Awning 1
Haha, different priorities. I don't care where the pax park, I was thinking of the aircraft, especially the big freighters.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
strickerje
strickerje 1
I might be wrong on this, but I thought ANC used to be busier than it is now since it was a refueling point back when airliners had shorter range, similar to Gander, Moncton, and Bangor. I wouldn't think they'd need parking anyway if it's just to refuel.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
SeanAwning
Sean Awning 2
PS -- They're having a really bad snow day 3/5, missed approaches for braking, UPS 108 had an engine fail on takeoff, declared an emergency and headed to Fairbanks rather than land at PANC. Parking stands are filling up. Give their ATC some applause for handling all that as if it were routine -- which, unfortunately, it is.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
SeanAwning
Sean Awning 2
It's still a refueling point. There's an underground pipe system so they don't have to roll multiple trucks to refuel the big freighters, and a limited number of hydrants connected to the system. There isn't a lot of extra apron and taxiway space, nowhere to do ground holds.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
cpergiel
Chuck Pergiel 1
Can't fly over Russia anymore? Sounds like the Cold War. See this map: https://pergelator.blogspot.com/2019/08/pic-of-day.html
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

ログイン

パスワードをお忘れですか？
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか？ 今すぐ登録（無料）！機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます！
FlightAwareに登録する
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる