Back to Squawk list
  • 44

Tailwind and poor braking present before ERJ-145 excursion

送信時刻:
 
Preliminary indications suggest the Envoy Air Embraer ERJ-145 which suffered a runway excursion at Chicago O'Hare had landed with a tailwind in gusting conditions. (www.flightglobal.com) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


airuphere
If you watch the video... looks like they should of kept going on the rwy - breaking action wasn’t good enough for that high speed taxi way.. they had runway left..
Video Link FYI —>>. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=quMUAwp_szk
mk882004
I also am of the opinion that there is NO way they were trying to turn off on a reverse high speed on snowy conditions. They appear to have begun to lost control long before they were at P4,
williambaker08
Like i said before they were trying to turn off at P4 from what the FAA was saying and i got yelled at for it. They were going way to fast for that turn off in any conditions.
abowland
P4 would have been a reverse high speed for them...almost no way they were trying to turn off.
Searcher06
Only a 9Kt tailwind. However the 24Kt gusting crosswind on a marginal surface condition could be fun.....
jbowman90
I bet they just weathervaned in the crosswind.
ppcflyer777
ppcflyer777 1
That's what it looks like. I believe they said the runway condition at the time was 1/1/1
svenf
Sven Freitag 1
9 kts tailwind is quite substantial, most airlines consider 10 an absolute cutoff as far as I know.
WALLACE24
Those conditions can bite the best of of pilots. Just because the previous traffic made it means nothing to the next guy. That said, the pilots will bear the heat, barring a mechanical failure, just because,
ADAvViation
am I wrong, I do not see the spoilers being deployed
abowland
The outer panels are just that...panels. The spoilers are deployed right at the bottom of the screen or at the wind root.
Tanman3880
If you look at the AV herald article (link below) it shows an aerial image of O'Hare and the "approximate final position" of the plane. It appears that the plane veered left and skidded off on the "N-1" turn off which appears to be for planes landing on 28R (opposite direction). I'm no expert. Scary for sure.



https://avherald.com/h?article=4cf1eedf&opt=0
mbrews
mbrews 2
- Given the runway conditions and possible tailwind component, perhaps flight crew had an unfortunate case of Get-there-itis. Not sure what was their alternate, nor whether at the alternate.

Note the regional carriers only get paid to "move the rig" from point A to point B. Would be interesting to review stats on how many Regional flights end up diverting to alternates, versus how many Mainline flights involve a diversion
ppcflyer777
ppcflyer777 1
The airline only gets paid for A to B but the pilots and flight attendants get paid by the flight hour.
pthomas745
"suffered a runway excursion"

Reading this crap is torture.......
Lib4ever
Could have been worse. Could have said "excursion from the tarmac."
notarookie
I love tarmac & cheese
JohnSmythe
Ya, I guess it would be politically incorrect to refer to it as a “ bit of a wipe out” but with a good ending.
KobeHunte
Kobe Hunte -6
So pilot error is to do with it?
KobeHunte
I was just asking a question and got downvoted like crazy...

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

abowland
You can't possibly be serious...
ppcflyer777
ppcflyer777 1
For some GA airplanes, after touchdown, that can help. That is not how you do it in this jet or any other that I am aware of.

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!
当ウェブサイトはクッキーを使用します。当ウェブサイトを使用し、サイト内を移動することで、あなたはこれに同意したこととみなされます。
閉じる
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる