← Back to Squawk list

Challenger 601 down in Mexico

送信時刻：丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前

A Bombardier Challenger has crashed while returning from KLAS just over nothern Mexico. (www.mirror.co.uk) さらに...

JAKE YOUNGS

47 人のメンバーからのコメント

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Shenghao Han 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 7

2019 isn’t a lucky year it seems...

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Kobe Hunte 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

I agree with you on that one. First came the 737s, and now all of these crashes.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Richard Orgill 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 6

I know that crew...RIP

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Torsten Hoff 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 5

Fox News has a story with a picture of the wreckage. The aircraft doesn't appear to have had much horizontal speed at the time of impact since the debris is all in one spot and there are no obvious gouges in the terrain leading to the wreck.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/mexico-plane-crash-las-vegas

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

SmittySmithsonite 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

Yeah, that is odd, for sure - was like it was parked there, and burned. Tail is upside down, but I can't tell if the rest of it is ... Something strange going on there ...

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Relics 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Condolences to the family and friends. So the idea is this may be another weather related accident?

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

tljax 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

ADS-B data shows rapid climb in 4 seconds from 40600 to 45675 followed by a 20k fpm descent before data fade.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 7

If that is accurate and it probably is, he probably hit an updraft and flamed out both engines....
With no chance of a relight! After that... He is pretty much a flying coffin! At that altitude, that a/c cannot light it's APU, so he was on battery power with very little of anything else!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Highflyer1950 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 5

Always better to fly around weather rather than try to top it near the ac service ceiling. I’ll take a rough ride in thicker air and add a few minutes by avoiding it where possible. Even when flying in the high 40’s I still give the big Cb’s a lot of room.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

Amen, it's another reason we are still here.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

The RAT would or should have auto-deployed.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

cassious 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Doubtful.. At FL400 and above, there would be plenty of time to get at least one engine running. Even after the shock of the silence has faded...

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Some more homework, core lock is a thing for cf34's but probably not applicable in this instance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinnacle_Airlines_Flight_3701

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Side Note, if he really did go up as high as the ADSB data lists, then a Core Lock is highly probable!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

From the link below and looking at the Data:

379 436 40,925 2,083 Climbing

Last documented altitude was almost 41,000 feet and still climbing at over 2000 feet per minute!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

That was the incident I was referring to... I personally saw the FDR Data and heard the CVR! The crew were having a Joy Ride and paid the ultimate price for it...

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

Your ADS-B numbers for the climb would yield a climb rate of over 76,000 fpm which would indicate a vertical gust that would rip the wings off if encountered at any altitude, and many orders of magnitude above part 25 certification requirements. Doesn't matter, but the math doesn't work with the picture of the airplane with the burned up wings in view.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Frank Harvey 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

If altitude is determined by barometric pressure and not by other means, eg radar, in areas of significant atmospheric disturbances altimeter readings may be unreliable. A 5000 foot climb in 4 seconds is remarkable and could induce excessive g on the souls on board and the airframe.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Frank Harvey 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

Ignore this post, it seems others (see below) already covered it.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Kobe Hunte 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

your comment still was more informative and helped me to get the gist of it more.. Thank you

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sharon bias 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

Do smaller jets have flight data recorders? If so, these will tell an sad tale. But it should be very educational.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 4

multi-engine turbine powered aircraft with 10 or more legal passenger seats must have a flight data recorder per the regs.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

I believe that a/c should have one then.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

btweston 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

Does that include a CVR?

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

The CVR I believe follows the same rules, so it should have one.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

cassious 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

If the aircraft was on a 135 certificate, then it is required to have a CVR.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 -1

If it was a part 91 airplane it was required to have a CVR. What other kind is there? The 135 is an operational addendum. Do your own homework.

https://www.risingup.com/fars/info/part91-609-FAR.shtml

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

Some yes, some no....

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

bentwing60 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 2

https://flightaware.com/squawks/view/1/y_days/popular/72886/Plane_crash_at_Kerrville_TX#226716

The picture in my link is the point! Can't hit that flat without an unrecoverable stall with an aft CG. the Baron didn't have any fuel in it, the Challenger did, but not much. And 15 degrees right would have cleared the weather, yet he chose to try to out climb it. Challengers ain't home sick angels, ergo you turn, not climb for tall weather. Got a CL60 type in my pocket with a few hours of doin it. This aircraft is registered to a US trustee, since 2017, with an N number and spent 98% of it's time flying around central and northern MX. And probably on somebodies US 135 certificate. It smells at least and if it really had 10 pax., then it wasn't legal without a FDR. The US customs departure form lists 12 souls, crew of 3, 9 pax. Many discrepancies in the "food editor" reporting so far but at any rate I hope the DEA just lost some persons of interest. If not, RIP.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Torsten Hoff 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

There are two things that immediately stood out to me when I saw the flight track and crash site photo — the severe weather in the immediate vicinity, and the fact that they seemed to have fallen out of the sky and pancaked. There is a big bush behind the right wing that would have been taken out if they had had any forward momentum. They seem to have gotten into a stall / flat spin and never recovered.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

siriusloon 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 6

That happened with the #1 prototype during early flight tests at Mojave. It had a spin 'chute and it was deployed, but didn't help enough, so the crew bailed out. Unfortunately, one of them got caught in the spin 'chute and was killed.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 4

There is certainly evidence that he had a Steep, Flat Approach to the Crash Site... It looks like he was at or close to his service ceiling (41,000). The CL60 has a very close envelope for speeds at that altitude. I know of a couple of pilots who hot dogged a CRJ-200 at 43000' flamed out both engines and died at the crash site.... I too agree that they should have turned, as the weather was not that far south of them and would not have cost them much time.

Just thinking back to an Great Old Friend, Preacher (RIP) who loved flying the CL60/200's... I am sure he could have given us some good insight.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Cansojr 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 5

You should not swear in your Squawks, keep it clean. Stick to your point without swearing. Thank you and a good day to you sir.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Kobe Hunte 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

agreed!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Kobe Hunte 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

seriously? What you are saying makes no sense. Get a grip.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

strickerje 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

Only thing I can figure is he responded to a comment that got deleted.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

Not deleted... It was Down voted!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

strickerje 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

I see nighflyer’s comment was downvoted, but you can still click to view it, and it reads as though it’s responding to another comment that isn’t there at all. At least, that’s the only way it makes sense to me. :)

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

strickerje 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 0

Oh never mind - the line he’s referring to is in bentwing’s post; I just missed it.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Lucila Hernández 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

Im.so.sorry.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

cassious 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

15 right and we wouldn't be having this conversation. I have no idea what this crew were thinking.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Michael Lewis 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 1

N601Vh - https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N601VH/history/20190505/2100Z/KLAS/MMMY

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Ric Wernicke 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 -5

I saw the flight plan showed the pilots license "pending." Why are these people flying passengers before their ticket is issued? Reminds me of the Lear that crashed in Mexico with the pilot having a private rating.

Time for law enforcement to be sure only those qualified have access to US runways.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

royalbfh 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

umm, that would be the Customs Decal that is pending.....

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

royalbfh 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

and I see that on the pilots line, it doesn't mean that he does not have a license

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

cassious 丁度一年（虎舞流ｗ）前 3

Probably a 61.75 foreign based US pilot certificate which is required to fly N reg aircraft internationally. There is a bit of a lag time from when the temp is issued until the permanent certificate comes with the cert number.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.

閉じる

Challenger 601 down in Mexico

47 人のメンバーからのコメント

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

ログイン