← Back to Squawk list
  • 18

Bombardier launches 90 seat Q400 turboprop airliner

送信時刻：
 
Bombardier launched a 90 seat variant of its Q400 aircraft, making it the world’s only commercial turboprop capable of carrying 90 passengers. (www.aviationanalysis.net) さらに...

Sainulabid Pothangodan
ニュースジャンキーADS-Bフィーダー発言者プロモーターアナウンサー自叙伝作家

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


Ruger9X19
Ruger9X19 3
800 hours between A checks? I don't know weather to be scared or impressed.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
oowmmr
oowmmr 2
This morning I read Bombardier is laying of 7000 employees.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
clbea
Claude B. 0
I just read yesterday Boeing will laying of from 4000 up to 8000 workers.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
clbea
Claude B. 1
Plus 14,000 retirement on its way!
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
OnTheHorizon
Tony Smith 1
Really don't want to ever fly in one of these.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
dee9bee
dee9bee 1
Can you say 'tailstrike'? We'll see.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
dee9bee
dee9bee 1
I stand corrected, I see the outside dimensions will remain the same.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
clbea
Claude B. 1
Perfect for Porter Air Line if it is impossible to have the CSeries there.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
scott8733
scott8733 1
I'd consider 28" pitch corporal punishment for anyone over 5'-9". Perhaps the model designation should be " DVT 400"
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
Kawaiipoint2
Kawaiipoint2 1
Strictly for a European low cost carrier market. Itll never fly in the US
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
wopri
Wolfgang Prigge 1
28" pitch is barely adequate for a school bus intended for primary schools.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
jwmson
jwmson 1
28" pitch? "The cattle will please refrain from mooing."
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
bsander23
michael dallaverde -6
If an airline purchases this "New" product, it speaks volumes about what they think about their passengers. Sadly, this is a desperate attempt my bombardier to reignite a dieing product.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report
DAL521
DAL521 5
dying product?? The Q400 is the most successful Turboprop ever build! And they only making this move to increase the Seat capacity because there is a demand from airlines.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
bsander23
michael dallaverde 0
Oh fun, I can argue that point any way you choose. Q vs. ATR? Q orders vs turbo jet. American airlines operating Q's...vs? Keep in mind I used to work for Bombardier...know a LOT about the Q program. Do you have a link citing the "most successful turboprop ever built"? Check the order logs...the plane is too expensive comparatively....we can review what Republic did with theirs? Your choice.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
clbea
Claude B. 1
It is faster then ATR.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
bsander23
michael dallaverde 1
I don't deny the plane was successful. I'm arguing its on its last leg. All great planes suffer this inevitable fate. 727, MD-80s, CRJ-200, sadly....the 747...Very sad. I wish they'd bring back the older dash-8s...(100 they 300) personally.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
DAL521
DAL521 2
I have read "the most successful Turboprop ever build" in a Magazine from my home Airport some times ago, okay could be also some promotional lie. But any way, for me it is the best Turboprop, many airlines have chosen the Q400 in the last years especially Asian Airlines. But your right all great planes suffer this fate, it seems so that quality means nothing today it's only about god dam'n money.
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report
charlesKimane
Kimane charles 1
Agreed dal. It's the best most reliable plane. They are all over the Caribbean. The Atr 72-600 give a lot of problems but the dash 8 just works
返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

ログイン

パスワードをお忘れですか？
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか？ 今すぐ登録（無料）！機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます！
FlightAwareに登録する
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる