当ウェブサイトはクッキーを使用します。当ウェブサイトを使用し、サイト内を移動することで、あなたはこれに同意したこととみなされます。
閉じる
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる
Back to Squawk list
  • 29

With $30 Oil, Why Do Some Airlines Maintain Fuel Surcharges?

送信時刻:
 
Airline fuel surcharges have begun to largely disappear. Carriers have eliminated them as oil prices remain low. But there are a few airlines that are hanging on to fuel surcharges, and some, like Qantas, that built surcharges into their base fares and haven’t significantly adjusted them downward. Why do some airlines maintain fuel surcharges and why haven’t they shared the benefit of lower prices with consumers? There are several reasons... (airinsight.com) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


[This poster has been suspended.]

WALLACE24
You sure it isn't so they can give you pilots a raise? Lol
yr2012
Because they can
dee9bee
dee9bee 2
I agree with Matt. I also agree that the surcharge could go for now, great marketing tool. Show of hands...How many of you think that oil prices will STAY this low? All it will take is someone doing something stupid in the Middle East and oil prices will be right back where they were.
akayemm
Expect surcharge to exist even if the oil is available for free !
usad
usad 5
Most airlines obtain fuel contracts in advance and in most cases can't take advantage of downward fluctuations unless they continue for some time.
dc3orbust
OK, let's accept your explanation. Why is it that increases happen immediately? If fuel was bought so far in advance, when the price of fuel goes up we should still get low prices while using the cheaply bought fuel.
Its all smoke and mirrors.
martidav
Dave Ma 4
Gordon Gecko
209flyboy
It's kida like paying tolls for building a bridge, it never goes away but becomes another 'Cash Cow'later. Greed!
cnyflyboy
Airline fuel surcharges at this time are all uncalled for. I understand the reasons what the airlines are doing with their savings from the low oil prices, but we passengers should be included as well to give us some relief from the high airfares.
ACMierzeje
Railroad regulation almost destroyed the industry, harming customers above all.
RRKen
That was under the ICC, currently, the Surface Transportation Board governs railroad oversight. Under the STB, unreasonable rates, fees, and surcharges are adjudicated so that customers have a voice.
WALLACE24
To maximize profit for their shareholders. Until market conditions dictate they will not lower prices by dropping surcharge. Duh!
erisajd
erisajd 2
Because they can and it is an easy profit - or -

they have fuel hedge contracts that keep their cost higher but constant -
21voyageur
Common between both of your thoughts is profit. Airlines are not forced into market speculation / hedging; they choose to do so to insure that shareholders are buffered by fuel price fluctuations. I am not suggesting that that purchasing on the spot market is good business, perhaps changing your use of "or" to "and" better reflects the situation. This has nothing to do with passengers and everything to do with stock prices.
Highflyer1950
Free enterprise, gotta' love it!
Scabbard
Probably because few people are aware the surcharges are happening. A good round of national news attention likely would make a difference.
21voyageur
For no different reason that gasoline companies. PROFIT - as driven by shareholder expectations. Plenty of greed to go around! This is a more complex (ie: societal) problem that "consumers vs big oil"
kinoworks
Much more profitable than cleaning planes and providing decent seats.
kanadaken2
Same as the "AIRPORT IMPROVE MENT TAX) Toronto, Give me a break.
jcsjcs
jcsjcs 1
Two main reasons haven't been mentioned in the article.

1) Fuel surcharge is often charged for award tickets. By having a fuel surcharge that sometimes is higher than buying a ticket in cash directly (special fares can come with "reduced" fuel surcharges) quite a lot of revenue is generated by something that should be free to the passenger.

2) Discounts to bulk purchasers are usually given based on the base fare, not the fuel surcharge. High surcharges effectively reduce the negotiated discount.

3) Any kickbacks or commissions will be paid based on the base fare, but not on the fuel surcharge.

Some countries have picked up on this scam and have fixed the fuel surcharge based on the current cost of fuel (Japan, Hong Kong) or outright banned a fuel surcharge on award tickets (Brazil). Most other countries are still like paradise for the airlines, though.
travelcoordinator
The prices are and will remain low for a long while, the airlines should remove the surchages as quickly as (they were to add it) when the oil prices were high...
tedtlaw
tedtlaw 1
No moral compass just like Martin Shkreli?
outward
It becomes a matter of the bottom line. The main goal of a business is to make money. Makes sense. They need to make money to pay salaries, buy supplies, pay utilities, etc, etc. When costs go down, they get to make more money. Yay. However . . . at a certain point, it becomes unreasonable if not gouging. I was in Samson, Alabama this past weekend to head to the Senior Bowl in Mobile. A friend's dad was complaining about having to pay $4.00 a gallon for propane even though fuel and oil prices were way down. Understandable. Why did he have to pay so much? Because the seller could charge that much. More profit and a bigger bottom line. It's not right, but that's the way it is unfortunately. I'm not sure what people can do about it either.
RECOR10
RECOR10 1
I am on the sellers side - ebb and flow of the market. Take advantage where you can.
RRKen
The airline industry needs oversight just as the Railroad industry has where fees and tariffs that are not reasonable can be challenged and adjudicated. I realize there are some who feel this might be over-regulation by the Government, but it is the customers who win in the end.

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!