← Back to Squawk list

23

Feds: Engine from Vegas plane fire to be taken to GE plant

送信時刻：5 年前

Crash investigators plan to remove and disassemble a General Electric engine that caught fire last week on the British Airways aircraft. (hosted.ap.org) さらに...

Kris Durbin

26 人のメンバーからのコメント

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

preacher1 5 年前 4

Glad to see there is not just a knne jerk reaction on this engine, that they seem to be leaning toward an anamoly, as in STUFF HAPPENS. That is why we have all the evac training and fire trucks on scene. Good Job gang.LOL

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

sparkie624 5 年前 1

Anytime you have an UnContained Engine Failure it is an anomaly. I am personally guessing bearing, or Burner Can Failure... But time will tell. GE will find the answer.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

joel wiley 5 年前 1

Where else would the take if for analysis? Is there a question of propriety that the work be done at a GE site?

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Brian Bishop 5 年前 1

GE is very sensitive to proprietary information and they will no doubt determine the cause of the failure and make any corrective action necessary to their materials and processes. My company is heavily involved in GE gas turbine work on the industrial as well as the Aero side and there are many places in my own company I'm not allowed because I'm not GE clearanced.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Ruger9X19 5 年前 1

GE as manufacturer needs the results of the investigation to keep their fleet safe and create any repairs to their systems or processes the investigation uncovers for liability reasons. Also, the cognizant engineers are more accessible and the necessary labs and tooling is available at the manufacturer.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

joel wiley 5 年前 2

The reasonable and prudent person test would dictate sending it to GE. Good move IMO. But in this world of conspiracy theorists, anything goes.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

preacher1 5 年前 6

BTW, yesterday was last chemo. Radiation over on Friday. Followup CAT scan next month on 19th

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Ruger9X19 5 年前 2

Great news! Hope all goes well on the follow up.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Ruger9X19 5 年前 4

The investigation is handled per CFR Title 49 Subtitle B Chapter 8 Part 830 and 831
Specifically §831.11 Parties to the investigation.

(a) All Investigations, regardless of mode. (1) The investigator-in-charge designates parties to participate in the investigation. Parties shall be limited to those persons, government agencies, companies, and associations whose employees, functions, activities, or products were involved in the accident or incident and who can provide suitable qualified technical personnel actively to assist in the investigation. Other than the FAA in aviation cases, no other entity is afforded the right to participate in Board investigations.

You can read all about it here. http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=01770d8e6dbe5ed726e57ed4591fa8cd&mc=true&r=PART&n=pt49.7.831

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Kris Durbin 5 年前 1

Great response. And THAT is why this is good news, AND worth mentioning, Joel. The NTSB could have just as easily made the decision to hold the investigation entirely in their own hands. Nobody was seriously injured or killed, so allowing GE to conduct the investigation ensures the greatest chance of correction and mitigation of future occurrences without conflict of interest.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

joel wiley 5 年前 2

Agree. And GE has too much skin in the game to want to hide anything that may come up.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

preacher1 5 年前 1

You are correct my friend in that there is a shortage of reasonable and prudent people in this day and age. GE could send an on site team as they have but tis far better to send it to the factory where all is there that is needed to dissect it and you can bet they will.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

JAMES CALDWELL 5 年前 1

could have been a cracked fuel line at a b-nut?? could have been over torqued.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 5 年前 1

I doubt that, problem there is that the lines go to the nozzles that are outside of the hot section... If there was a leak there, any fire or spark would have gone out the tail pipe...

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

joel wiley 5 年前 0

In any case, whatever is found will probably be to old news to be of interest to the Breathless News Network.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

sparkie624 5 年前 0

It will be reported, but you are correct, it will be old news by that time, but I am sure we will see a blub on it here.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Ken Hardy 5 年前 1

The GE 90 is a growth project engine, so the dash number is important. if it's a -115 then the design is one that is pushed to the limit on thrust. I once asked the long time head of Delta's Engine shop how he viewed GE vs Pratt engines and he said the GE design was very precise but the Pratt was more robust

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

Gene Poon 5 年前 1

The news story says it was an -85B.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Dolf Brouwers 5 年前 1

Is it not a FOD caused Fire ?

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

preacher1 5 年前 1

No

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Dee Lowry 5 年前 1

Obviously there was a problem with #1 engine. It burped but they have 2 halon extinguishers to put the fire out. It was 103 degrees in LAS. Imagine what the runway temp was. Like I've said before, you abort at V1 and stand on the brakes. Hence, the black smoke and fire wrapping around the fuselage. This is just my opinion but the fire was caused by a "Wheel Well" fire. They blew the tires. Been there. Good job to the crew.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

sparkie624 5 年前 1

No way.... There were engine parts found on the runway trailing from the time of the abort... This had nothing to do with the wheels or breaks. It was an internal engine break down... Something came apart from the internal core of the engine. That much has been proven. Make note that the engine cowl on the outboard side of the engine is where it had started.... If it had been the tires and breaks the initial problem would have been on the inboard side of the cowlings.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Dee Lowry 5 年前 1

Sparkie- I stand corrected!

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

Arthur Netteler 5 年前 -4

This is Smart on the part of GE... That way we will NEVER KNOW what actually happened. I wonder how much of a BRIBE they paid the FEDS for this GIFT???

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•Report

sparkie624 5 年前 3

Just for a heads up.. During the entire testing process, the investigators are with them the entire time...Also remember the rudder issue of the 737... Boeing and the Feds worked on that problem and the Boeing engineer pointed out the real problem with the actuator. There is no pay out or bribe in these situations... They want to get this fixed and make sure this does not happen to anyone else. I feel that your comment was in bad taste.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

joel wiley 5 年前 2

Your tin foil helmet is showing.

返信 ↓•パーマリンク•上位•Report

ログイン

当ウェブサイトはクッキーを使用します。当ウェブサイトを使用し、サイト内を移動することで、あなたはこれに同意したこととみなされます。

閉じる

FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか？

広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.

閉じる