当ウェブサイトはクッキーを使用します。当ウェブサイトを使用し、サイト内を移動することで、あなたはこれに同意したこととみなされます。
閉じる
FlightAwareのフライト追跡は広告によりサポートされていることをご存知ですか?
広告表示を許可してくださることでFlightAware.comを無料で提供することができます。表示される広告は関連性の高い控えめなものを選んでいます。FlightAwareをホワイトリストに追加する方法はかんたんに設定していただくことができます。または、プレミアムアカウントのご利用をご検討ください.
閉じる
Back to Squawk list
  • 97

Super-Rare XP-82 Twin Mustang Flies Again After Decade-Long Restoration

送信時刻:
 
Of the five Twin Mustangs left in the world, two are on display in the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio. Another is a gate guard at Lackland AFB in Texas. One is currently undergoing restoration. And one—just one—is, at long last, ready to fly. (www.popularmechanics.com) さらに...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


jdriskell
James Driskell 10
I remember seeing the Twin Mustangs all the time, either outbound or inbound to McChord AFB in the late '40s or early '50. We lived directly under the flight pattern to the north of the base. Seeing one was always a treat. I'm looking forward to seeing this one in flight.
jbsimms
James Simms 2
Was stationed @ Ft.Lewis 85-86 living in Steliacoom. Know what you mean, used to see C-141’s coming in over the base for runway 34. Seemed like they always did their turn right over the Lewis Ammo Supply Point
bingobanner
Russ Brown 2
I was a deckhand on the ferry.
bingobanner
Russ Brown 2
5106 s. Oakes St in Tacoma was in the pattern.
FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 1
A single Merlin sounds really neat. How do two sound ? Did you ever hear any synch mismatch ?
jdriskell
James Driskell 2
The P-82 was powered by 2 × Allison V-1710-143/145 counter-rotating liquid-cooled V12 engines, 1,600 hp (1,193 kW) each. I don't really remember the engine sound but the snap of a Merlin is distinctive.
FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 1
Thanks James. I think the Mustang Merlins were around 1400 HP.
lchamp
lchamp 1
This is the XP-82 with twin contra-rotating Merlins. They were later converted to Allisons.
sparkie624
sparkie624 1
Back then the Prop Sync was not as good as it is today... You will here some to be sure.
FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 1
I can't imagine what it was like for mx to adjust the cabling for the throttles, and control surfaces on the dual control from either cockpit versions.
sparkie624
sparkie624 4
Probably not as bad as you think... You get them close and then they had a mechanical computer that would keep them in sync, so once you got to altitude, you were pretty good.... Keep in mind that you have to be within 50 RPM's to engage it and you cannot use it for takeoff's and landings.... Would be bad to lose your master motor and have the good engine to follow it. :)

FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 2
Thanks Sparky. I tend to forget we had ingenious mechanical devices to handle what is now done by electronics.
sparkie624
sparkie624 6
WOW.. Nice... I love to see these Rare birds come to life...
jdubick
James Dubick 3
I was a flight instructor at the Cessna dealer Skyway Aviation in Orlando FL and signed Tom off for his private ticket in Sept. of 1967. I just checked my old log book. A lot of water under the bridge for both of us.
lchamp
lchamp 2
I'm a volunteer at the Valiant Air Command Warbird Museum where Tom keeps his B-25. He has lots of projects working right now. XP-82 is top priority, of course.
FrankHarvey
Frank Harvey 3
Must have been fun to lose an engine on takeoff especially if you were the non-pic on the dual control version.
jbsimms
James Simms 3
Outstanding
chrisdmock
Chris Mock 3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-82_Twin_Mustang
PSUAth
Supercool Marmol 5
Missed the opportunity to call it the P-102
TWA55
TWA55 1
That is one way to stay buddies, I have the controls NO I DO, lol It was a strange looking acrft
usrepeaters
Rob Palmer 1
Would love to see performance specs on this. E.G., top speed at altitude. Wonder how it handled with one engine landing.
dbtinc
Jim Capone -4
Guess military spending was out of control then as now!
jbsimms
James Simms 2
The -82 was conceived during WW2 when bases weren’t close enough to Japan for the current fighters of the day. Once Iwo Jima was taken & secured, P-51’s were able to make the trip but the -82 continued development.

From wiki: “This aircraft was accepted by the Army Air Forces on 30 August 1945, whose officials were so impressed by the aircraft, while still in development, that they ordered the first production P-82Bs in March 1945, fully three months before its first flight. The XP-82 prototypes, and production P-82Bs and P-82Es, retained both fully equipped cockpits so that pilots could fly the aircraft from either position, alternating control on long flights, while later night fighter versions kept the cockpit on the left side only, placing the radar operator in the right position.”

Have to remember that jets were still in their infancy, several P-80’s crashed including one that took the life of Richard Bong (the leading fighter ace in the Pacific), on August 6, 1945; the day of the dropping of the first nuke on Hiroshima.

Even w/the advent of the Korean War same five years later, jets were small in #’s w/limited range, so props were the plane of choice @ the start (large #’s of prop fighters w/an available pool (Active Duty & Reserve/National Guard) of pilots already trained. Jet training took a little longer as it was a tatoally new beast.

ログイン

アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? 今すぐ登録(無料)!機能やフライトアラート、その他様々な設定をカスタマイズできます!